Archive for the ‘Vitrue STATs’ Category

The South Dominates College Football Social Buzz

Friday, December 4th, 2009
Vitrue SMI - Top Social College Teams 11.24.09 to 12.2.09

  1. USC
  2. Ohio State
  3. Florida
  4. LSU
  5. Mississippi
  6. Auburn
  7. Texas
  8. Georgia Tech
  9. Michigan State
  10. Missouri
  11. Alabama
  12. Michigan
  13. Oklahoma
  14. Georgia
  15. West Virginia
  16. Nebraska
  17. Clemson
  18. Florida State
  19. UCLA
  20. Oregon
  21. Cincinnati
  22. Standford
  23. Iowa
  24. Boise State
  25. Virginia Tech
BCS Ranking 12.2.09

  1. Florida
  2. Alabama
  3. Texas
  4. TCU
  5. Cincinnati
  6. Boise State
  7. Oregon
  8. Ohio State
  9. Iowa
  10. Georgia Tech
  11. Penn State
  12. Virginia Tech
  13. LSU
  14. BYU
  15. Pittsburgh
  16. Oregon State
  17. Miami (FL)
  18. USC
  19. California
  20. Oklahoma State
  21. Houston
  22. Nebraska
  23. West Virginia
  24. Stanford
  25. Utah

We worked with “USA Today” to release our updated college football social buzz ranking.  Preseason we reported how the field was shaping up. Now as the BCS closes in, no better time to see what the social web is most passionate about as we head into the almighty national play-offs.

What strikes me about the social ranking is the Southeastern Conference presence and how their teams are really generating buzz and attention through their on-field performance.  The other interesting note is the SEC garners excellent TV exposure that results with a great track record of success.

Another point is Florida State’s social ranking  at #18 despite their 6-6 season, they ranked high on the SMI all season- especially during the last weeks – perhaps you can attribute that to the Bobby Bowden situation - had the entire country talking…and the “demise” of FSU football?

Auburn peaked during the last seven days with build up to the Alabama game as last week it was the featured game with huge TV exposure…possibly had everyone talking about a huge possible upset.

One thing I have state as my Catholic upbringing and my old nun teachers would be upset if I didn’t set the record straight….I essentially said Notre Dame is no longer part of the BCS conversation on a national title basis, they have become irrelevant – my grandparents would be furious if they heard that quote!

And my Dawgs….although not in play-off contention – we did finish the season strong by beating Tech last week and are still high on what people are talking about on the social web.

  • Share/Bookmark

Top Social College Football Teams – Time for Pig Skins and Pork Rinds

Thursday, August 27th, 2009
USA Today Preseason Ranking - Coaches’ Poll

  1. Florida
  2. Texas
  3. Oklahoma
  4. USC
  5. Alabama
  6. Ohio State
  7. Virginia Tech
  8. Penn State
  9. LSU
  10. Mississippi
  11. Oklahoma State
  12. California
  13. Georgia
  14. Oregon
  15. Georgia Tech
  16. Boise State
  17. TCU
  18. Utah
  19. Florida State
  20. North Carolina
  21. Iowa
  22. Nebraska
  23. Notre Dame
  24. Brigham Young
  25. Oregon State
Vitrue SMI - Top Social College Football Teams

  1. USC
  2. Ohio State
  3. Florida
  4. LSU
  5. Auburn
  6. Michigan State
  7. Texas
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Georgia Tech
  10. UCLA
  11. Georgia
  12. Alabama
  13. Michigan
  14. Clemson
  15. Ball State
  16. Missouri
  17. Oregon
  18. Virginia Tech
  19. Florida State
  20. East Carolina
  21. Brigham Young
  22. Miami
  23. West Virginia
  24. Iowa
  25. Penn State

Social media and college football - two of my biggest passions are coming together.

In conjunction with USA Today we are excited to announce the first annual ranking for college football teams getting the most buzz on the social web as the 2009 season gets ready to kick off.

Using the Vitrue SMI we ranked the teams and listed the top 25 most social teams. There are a few surprises when compared to the USA Today’s coaches poll.

USC scored first in terms of social buzz, with great anticipation riding on the shoulders of true Freshman QB Matt Barkley. The Florida Gators, coming into the season as the most anticipated consensus #1 favorite in years, was surprisingly only #3 in social ranking.

In addition, fans believe the storied programs Michigan and UCLA will snap back into form after underwhelming initial seasons under new coaches Rich Rodriguez and Rick Neuheisel respectively.  Coming off rough seasons last year, the buzz could be attributed to fans hoping they bounce back this year. It is also interesting that Ball State ranks #15 on the social ranking, despite not being a big-time “football” school. They are coming off a great season and were undefeated in the 2008 regular season for the first time since 1949. Although they lost their championship game and Bowl game, their fans are chatting it up across the social web.  Fellow Sigma-Chi David Lettermen frequently boasts his alma mater - perhaps he is pushing some of the conversation as well.

I apologize to my SEC friends as Ole Miss and Tennessee (under full disclose Georgia is my alma mater) did not rank socially - just reporting the data folks. Also, to my WAC/Mountain West friends, sorry to say we don’t see Boise State, TCU or Utah rank socially either (I did play a year for University of New Mexico Lobos).

The point is - social media is a fascinating medium allowing unprecedented conversations.  It enables fans not just to cheer their teams on from the stands or in front of their TVs but to share their personal experiences and passions with their social circles - creating vibrant community and ongoing conversation.  Social media gives fans access, a playbook, whistle and a megaphone unlike ever before.

Get behind your teams and generate some buzz - it is going to be an awesome season!

We will be tracking the teams throughout the season and will provide some updates along the way, so be sure to shout out for your team in your status updates.

  • Share/Bookmark

Social Media and the Opportunity for the NFL

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

footballI am excited the new season of NFL football is quickly approaching – nothing better than fall football in my book. For the first time, fans will not only be sideline spectators but practically in the huddle with the players.

I provided some commentary to the Washington Post for an article that ran this past Sunday about the social media and the NFL.  A great article that covers the unique challenges and opportunities the NFL now faces with its first full season since the Twitter boom.

I wanted to provide some additional thoughts on the topic as well.

With the advent of social media, we are in an unchartered territory with the direct access and communication it provides.  Fans can touch and communicate on a one-to-one basis with their favorite players. Fans want to hear from players with an unfiltered connection – who they really are and how they live their lives.

Social media has a great equalizer effect enabling everyone to contribute and become a publisher themselves.  As we witnessed in the Obama run, everyone who participated through social media felt a part of the campaign.

Today we are seeing a similar phenomenon through the unfettered access fans have to players where their voice is heard directly and empowering the fans to “own” the relationship.

To date the NFL has not embraced social media as much but it represents a huge opportunity and its adoption will only increase.   We are also seeing in college football, Coach Les Miles is using Twitter to build buzz in recruiting and my alma mater, UGA, announced they will have a  sideline reporter covering social media outlets and issuing Facebook updates throughout game this upcoming season.

Sports are fundamentally event driven and we consume live event together. Social media allows people who watch together tools to find each other, talk about great plays, all of which creates a much more active environment.

Athletes themselves are embracing these tools and at large taking a truly authentic approach- providing insight to their daily lives and thinking which people find fascinating.  This is not about sharing for monetary gain but these endorsement opportunities will certainly come as marketers will want to find the right co-branding opportunities.  Authenticity will be the key and building the relationship paramount. Athletes can start to endorse products they use in their life –from iPods to an energy drink to good or bad restaurant experiences.  People want to know these intricacies and in short creates a peer recommendation at the highest level.

Social networks provide an unparalleled environment where we can create a threaded, branded conversation that is topical – based around an event or asset (video, image, etc…).  After all we are all brands and driving the conversation in an authentic way is key.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Vitrue 25 Top Social Athletes - July Snapshot

Thursday, July 16th, 2009
The Vitrue 25 Top Social Athletes - July Snapshot

  1. Lance Armstrong
  2. Tony Hawk
  3. Roger Federer
  4. Ronaldinho Gaúcho
  5. Michael Phelps
  6. Dwight Howard
  7. David Beckham
  8. Valentino Rossi
  9. Lebron James
  10. Michael Jordan
  11. Maria Sharapova
  12. Serena Williams
  13. Rafael Nadal
  14. Kobe Bryant
  15. Paul Pierce
  16. Usain Bolt
  17. Tiger Woods
  18. Ryan Sheckler
  19. Shaquille O’Neal
  20. Manny Pacquiao
  21. Yao Ming
  22. Dwyane Wade
  23. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
  24. Stewart Cink
  25. Muhammad Ali

The Vitrue 25 Top Social Athletes - July Snapshot

Sports for many of us are a way of life.  Sports unite us and create epic battle cries we rally around to be part of a team and it becomes part of our DNA to a large degree.

Our passion for sports also transcends boundaries from geographic regions to culture, race and sex.

We thought it would be not only interesting but also fun to take a look at the top social athletes to see who is being most buzzed about on the social web.

The Vitrue 25 Top Social Athlete ranking, as covered in USA Today, helps shed light on how truly social our society has become and is meant to provide a simple, directional snapshot of what is being most talked about on the social web – from social networks to photo and video sharing sites to blogs and microblogs, the list represents a week’s average of data in July and is most likely impacted by seasonality with such events as the Tour De France and Wimbledon.

You will no doubt notice the list is heavily occupied by athletes whose appeal transcends borders and the higher propensity for athletes who participate in individual versus team sports.

As a traditional sports guy, I was disappointed no NFL players made the list as I am a huge fan. That said, if you take a step back, many of the athletes on the list participate in sports which are played on a global level and is illustrative of the phenomenon social media has become connecting us all.

Sports stars are in and of themselves brands which build followings that create buzz not to mention legacies.  This social currency is extremely valuable with its far reaching and powerful effects.  As marketers continue to look to more tightly couple their sponsored athletes and sporting events with their social media presence, we would expect these numbers to continue to grow across the spectrum. We all are getting more social at an exponential rate and to reach the hearts and minds of consumers you have to be social.

We know the list may strike healthy debate because competition is what drive us.  One thing we also wanted to note, some stars are active social media users as we see from the velocity of Michael Phelps’s tweets to Dwight Howard’s multi-faceted social approach, some too have made the list not because they actively push content themselves but because they are just currently popular personas on the social web.

Want to check out your favorite?  Enter their name and see their score.  You can easily share and debate….long live rivalry!

For more on the Vitrue Social Media Index methodology

how social is your advertising?
vs.
Enter one or two brand names, phrases, or keywords
Vitrue Social Media Index. Measuring your online conversations.
  • Share/Bookmark

NCAA Final Four Social Buzz Predictions

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

I really enjoyed this past weekend’s games and wanted to update where we are with the social buzz predictions.

The Vitrue SMI correctly projected that two #1 seeds would be toppled (Louisville and Pittsburgh) and that UConn and UNC would make it to the finals as well. Unfortunately, SMI missed on Duke and Kansas, as they were in our final four with UNC and UConn. But Pitt and Louisville upsets were big selections for SMI.

So I have made by final picks based on social buzz and here is what I am seeing.

NCAA Basketball Tournament Social Share of Voice for Final Four

NCAA Basketball Tournament Social Share of Voice for Final Four

Final picks heading into this weekend’s ultimate madness…

1.  UConn

2.  UNC

3.  Michigan State

4.  Villanova

Go Huskies Go!

  • Share/Bookmark

Vitrue SMI Predicts #1 Seeds Will Be Toppled This Weekend

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

This weekend proves to be another epic weekend of college basketball as March Madness continues with the Sweet 16.  Excited to see who will be in the Final Four and if my social picks will get me closer to winning the office pool.

Using the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI) we pulled new data after this past weekend’s games to see which teams are now most social in terms of web chatter so we can make our picks for the Final Four Showdown.

Vitrue SMI Picks for the Final Four
UConn (1), UNC (1), Kansas (3), Duke (2)

This should be interesting to see as last year there were four #1 seeds in the Final Four.  The Vitrue SMI is predicting an upset to this as we see Kansas and Duke able to make the final cut while the two #1 seeds of Louisville and Pittsburgh will be out of contention.

Time will tell but I am ready for the ride and want so see who makes it.

We have also listed the Sweet 16 teams in order of social rank and it is interesting to see the most social chatter is  coming out of the West followed by the South with the East far behind.

NCAA Basketball Tournament Social Share of Voice by Region

NCAA Basketball Tournament Social Share of Voice by Region

Vitrue SMI Ranking of Sweet 16

  1. UConn Huskies (1)
  2. UNC Tar Heels (1)
  3. Kansas Jayhawks (3)
  4. Syracuse Orange (3)
  5. Missouri Tigers (3)
  6. Memphis Tigers (2)
  7. Michigan State Spartans (2)
  8. Duke Blue Devils (2)
  9. Louisville Cardinals (1)
  10. Arizona Wildcats (12)
  11. Oklahoma Sooners (2)
  12. Purdue Boilermakers (5)
  13. Pittsburgh Panthers (1)
  14. Gonzaga Bulldogs (4)
  15. Villanova Wildcats (3)
  16. Xavier Musketeers (4)

Based on our social picks last week, the Vitrue SMI accurately predicted 6 out of 10 (60%) upsets in the first round.
Two of the most notable predictions were Arizona (as #12 seed over  #5 seed Utah ) and Dayton (as #11 seed over #6 seed West Virginia).  While the Arizona/Utah game was tight the whole way through – they pulled it out while Dayton had little issue stomping over West Virginia.

We also wanted to look at the 10 biggest movers and losers of overall social chatter of the 64 teams since the tourney started for additional insights.

Top 10 Social Gainers
There are 4 teams in the Sweet 16 (**) who are getting a real morale boost from their fans based on increased social chatter.  UConn has the biggest point improvement overall, most likely due to the fact they entered the tournament perceived as a weaker #1 seed but have outperformed expectations with two very commanding wins in the opening rounds.  Dayton also surprised everybody (except the SMI rankings) with a win in the first round and saw significant increase in social chatter as a result.

1.  ** UConn Huskies
2.  Dayton Flyers
3.  ** Syracuse Orange
4.  Texas Longhorns
5.  ** Kansas Jayhawks
6.  USC Trojans
7.  ** Memphis Tigers
8.  Siena Saints
9.  Maryland Terrapins
10.  LSU Tigers

All top 10 social gainer teams this week won at least one game in the opening rounds.

Top 10 Social Losers
For most of this list, losing games and being out of the tournament is the reason for the drop-off in social chatter, with Boston College fans being the most disappointed.  Close behind, also with disappointed fans are the UCLA Bruins, the #1 ranked social team before the tournament started.  But what about Michigan State and Arizona, who are in the Sweet 16 (**) and still have a shot at the title?  Where are those fans?  Also, the prize for the most consistent fans go to the Washington Huskies and Cal State Northridge Matadors, whose fans love their teams just the same, win or lose.

1.  Boston College Eagles
2.  UCLA Bruins
3.  Utah Utes
4.  West Virginia Mountaineers
5.  ** Michigan State Spartans
6.  ** Arizona Wildcats
7.  East Tennessee State Buccaneers
8.  Washington Huskies
9.  Cal State Northridge Matadors
10.  Chattanooga Mocs

6 out of 10 of these teams lost in the first round.

Who do you think will make it to the Final Four?

  • Share/Bookmark

Will Fan Madness Lead Teams Deep Into the Tournament?

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009
Vitrue SMI Rank of NCAA Tournament (seed)  

  1. UCLA Bruins (6)
  2. Boston College Eagles (7)
  3. UNC Tar Heels (1)
  4. UConn Huskies (1)
  5. Kansas Jayhawks (3)
  6. Texas Longhorns (7)
  7. Cornell Big Red (14)
  8. Missouri Tigers (3)
  9. Michigan State Spartans (2)
  10. Washington Huskies (4)
  11. Tennessee Volunteers (9)
  12. Dayton Flyers (11)
  13. Syracuse Orange (3)
  14. USC Trojans (10)
  15. Memphis Tigers (2)
  16. Michigan Wolverines (10)
  17. Arizona Wildcats (12)
  18. Mississippi State Bulldogs (13)
  19. Maryland Terrapins(10)
  20. ASU Sun Devils (6)
  21. Utah Utes (5)
  22. Clemson Tigers (7)
  23. Duke Blue Devils (2)
  24. Wisconsin Badgers (12)
  25. Ohio State Buckeyes (8)
  26. Oklahoma Sooners (2)
  27. Illinois Fighting Illini (5)
  28. LSU Tigers (8)
  29. Louisville Cardinals (1)
  30. West Virginia Mountaineers (6)
  31. Texas A&M Aggies (9)
  32. Siena Saints (9)
  33. Purdue Boilermakers (5)
  34. BYU Cougars (8)
  35. Pittsburgh Panthers (1)
  36. FSU Seminoles (5)
  37. Oklahoma State Cowboys (8)
  38. Butler Bulldogs (9)
  39. California Golden Bears (7)
  40. North Dakota State Bison (14)
  41. Gonzaga Bulldogs (4)
  42. Minnesota Golden Gophers (10)
  43. Marquette Golden Eagles (6)
  44. Xavier Musketeers (4)
  45. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (4)
  46. Villanova Wildcats (3)
  47. Temple Owls (11)
  48. Utah State Aggies (11)
  49. Radford Highlanders (16)
  50. Northern Iowa Panthers (12)
  51. Akron Zips (13)
  52. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (12)
  53. Chattanooga Mocs (16)
  54. Cleveland State Vikings (13)
  55. Binghamton Bearcats (15)
  56. East Tennessee State Buccaneers (16)
  57. Portland State Vikings (13)
  58. Cal State Northridge Matadors (15)
  59. American University Eagles (14)
  60. Morehead State Eagles (16)
  61. Robert Morris Colonials (15)
  62. Virginia Commonwealth Rams (11)
  63. Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (14)
  64. Morgan State Bears (16)

Great weekend ahead for college basketball. As most who craft their bracket carefully, I need to get my picks in by Thursday before tip off for our friendly office pool (which does get a bit heated I must admit).  I have heard of many ways to create the best bracket from going with the tried and true favorites, to rankings to sheer gut but what about the fan momentum?  Can the most vocal fans prod their teams to pound the hardwoods and deliver wins?

We looked at online social buzz scores for the 64 teams leading into the height of this weekend’s March Madness – who will emerge as the Sweet 16 vying for the coveted NCAA Championship title and what does voice on the social web have to say about it anyway?

Using the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI) we reviewed all 64 teams in contention and wanted to provide some key findings. We measured social chatter across popular social networks like Facebook and MySpace, video and photo sharing sites, micro-blogs like Twitter and blogs (more on our methodology).

Can the teams that rank with the highest social share of voice tell us anything as we head into this divisive weekend?  Personally I am going to make my picks for Round 1 and 2 this weekend and honor the most social teams and see how I fare in the office pool. Last year I picked all number one seeds and came in second. So instead of using the top picks, I’m going with a contrarian approach using of fan enthusiasm as my guide. I will continue using the social chatter through the Vitrue SMI as my guide as we close in on the next round.  Check back next week and see how the voice of the fans will influence the outcome.

Most Social Team Selects Using Vitrue SMI Round ! and 2 NCAA 2009

Most Social Team Selects Using Vitrue SMI Round ! and 2 NCAA 2009

Looking at the Vitrue SMI rankings versus the seed rankings there are some interesting findings:

  • The #2 social team is Boston College who was a bubble team that made the tournament at a #7 seed
  • Also interesting is the #7 social team, Cornell, who won the Ivy league regular season and are a #14 seed
  • The most social team is UCLA and is a #6 seed
  • Not too surprising are two #1 seeds in UNC (#3 most social) and UConn (#4 most social) who are favored by many to win the entire tournament

Social Share of Voice for #1 and #2 seeds

Not surprisingly, UNC is leading the way with 28% of the social share of voice and UConn close behind with 23%. Interestingly all four #2 seeds in Michigan State, Memphis, Duke and Oklahoma beat out the remaining #1 seeds of Louisville and Pittsburgh.

This just may be the return of the upset year instead of last year where all four #1 seeds made the Final Four.

Social Share of Voice for 1 and 2 Seed NCAA teams

Social Share of Voice for 1 and 2 Seed NCAA teams

There are many ways to slice the data but one this is clear – fans are vocal on the social web.

Looking at the top-four teams, as well as a few others, some have a rich and vibrant basketball tradition and we could assume their fans follow passionately, regardless.  We should weigh big alumni associations/followings as well as sheer population and some teams are just “hot” coming off the conference tourneys.

It is an interesting snap shot to see if the most social teams will translate into the winners coming out of this weekend. I will be cheering for the Dayton Flyers where my two uncles went to school.  They are a Number 11 seed and should make them in the 40ish overall rank (as there are four 11 seeds) yet they are 12th overall as the most social team. Does this suggest they will be a dragon slayer and make it deep into the tournament, perhaps Sweet 16 or 8? Or will tiny Cornell matter?  Or can Boston College somehow continue Boston’s crown as “title town”? Wish the games were on today!

We recently launched an application for Papa John’s and the Final Four.  We see the use of the application as great testimony that passion in college sports is as big as ever, and no bigger than the big dance, the greatest sporting event in America. We see people taking tremendous social actions in support of their teams.  Providing strategy and technology, we enabled Papa John’s reach their fans on Facebook with a simple way to enter a sweepstakes to win a trip the Final Four – as of this morning, their leaderboard has the top four listed as North Carolina, Louisville, Duke and Syracuse.

Who are you cheering for? Sound off and let us know.

Methodology for snap shot of NCAA teams

Each day, Vitrue analyzes the online conversations on a variety of social networking, blogging, microblogging, photo and video sharing sites.

The Vitrue SMI calculates scores about the brand’s social conversations. We apply a series of algorithms to reflect the frequency of usage, the size of the social media environment, and the magnitude of the conversation. The result is a single numeric score for each brand: the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI).

The changing world of online conversations results in significant movements up and down for brands. We determined by averaging the SMI scores for each team as of March 15th, 2009. The result is a ranked list of the brands which are most talked about on the social web.

Because people often do not use a product’s full name in online conversations, we adapt our results to reflect common language usage. This dynamic process continues to evolve along with brands and language itself, with the goal of having the Vitrue SMI reflect the way people actually speak and type about brands.

Vitrue’s SMI reflects a combination of patent-pending technology, proprietary methodologies, and continuous refinement based on daily feedback and calibration. It provides the marketer with the industry’s simplest, most direct snapshot of conversations on the social web.

  • Share/Bookmark