Archive for the ‘Social Media Measurement’ Category

How to Take Your Social Media Presence from “Good to Great”: Creating the Facebook Flywheel

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

One of my favorite books of all time is a book called  “Good to Great”, written by Jim Collins.  It’s a best-seller and it talks about characteristics of companies who go from being good to being great.  One of the concepts he talks about in the book is the Flywheel.

"Good to Great", copyright Jim Collins

"Good to Great", copyright Jim Collins

The Flywheel Concept applies to companies when they break out and really start to hit accelerated growth. I think the Flywheel Concept can be applied to a brand’s Facebook presence, taking it from good to great. Hitting the synergy between earned media—in this case shared fan engagements and endorsements about your brand—combined with paid media can create a breakout success.  I like to think of it as the “Facebook Flywheel”.

A few weeks ago there was a great article in “Ad Age” about a Nielsen study on social context in ads.  It revealed a 16% greater recall of an ad if your friends are surfaced to “like” the product, cause or brand, especially if noticed through your news feed. And a greater recall of homepage ads when appearing alongside mentions of friends who are brand fans.

As Nielsen also cited, 90% of products and services are influenced by friend and/or peer recommendations.  And we’ve noted for some time now the effectiveness of messaging directly in the news feed, generating up to 110x greater interaction as opposed to other locations, like a Facebook tab. Clients that utilize our Social Relationship Manager platform—which allows brands to deliver engagements like polls, coupons, etc., directly in a user’s news feed—have wielded staggering results. Combine effective engagements directly in a user’s news feed (organic earned media), with Facebook ads that ties to your peers “likes,” and your brand is on its way from good to great.

Bottom line: You’ve got to tie-in the ads that you buy on Facebook with messaging that shows up in the news feed to double your impact.

Fundamentally this means the more fans you have on your Page, when you run ads on Facebook, the more relevant those ads become. If my friend “likes” a brand in an ad, I’m much more likely to click on or recall that ad. If your friend, family or peer “likes” a brand, you are much more willing to follow their lead. Birds of a feather – well, you know – they tend to flock together. This is especially true on Facebook.

Marketers need to focus on winning Facebook fans over the long haul if they want to improve their odds of success when advertising, as well as with shared engagement.  The higher click through on organic impressions is another indication of the power of earned media on Facebook.

This is why the Social Page Evaluator is so critical to measure and understand where you stand and how your page is valued today and then how you track that over time.

We saw a great void in the market as we know marketers are clamoring for data to determine ROI for their social media efforts, and we wanted to help push this conversation and thinking forward. We clearly struck a cord, as in less than a week since the product has launched, we have seen nearly 30,000 evaluations run from 121 countries.

Cultivating and growing your fans over time is where Vitrue products like the Social Relationship Manager (an arsenal for publishing to Facebook) and the Fan Management System (tab management) come into play.

These tools empower you to communicate and engage your fans so you actually get more growth in your fan page.   But then you also get more engagement and sharing effects when you add content that is relevant for your consumers.

Combine all this together with effective ads and you are on the Facebook Flywheel. And ready to go from good to great.

  • Share/Bookmark

Playing the Social Odds at the Kentucky Derby

Friday, April 30th, 2010

UPDATE: The winner of the 136th Kentucky Derby is Super Saver.  He was ranked 4th on our Top 5 Social Horses list.  Congratulations, Super Saver and Team!

We wanted to track the Derby horses to see who was garnering the most buzz across the vast social media space using the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI). Would that buzz correlate to the odds? Could it help in selecting a winner? Of course, the tracking is just a way to have a little fun with a very popular spectator sport taking place this Saturday at the beautiful Churchill Downs - the legendary Kentucky Derby. As noted in today’s USA Today sports section, Eskendereya is the third most buzzed about horse yet he won’t even be racing. Here are a few interesting highlights we found from our top-5 ranked horses.

Vitrue SMI - Top 5 Social Derby Horses

  1. Dublin (12:1)
  2. Lookin At Lucky (3:1)
  3. Eskendereya
  4. Super Saver (15:1)
  5. Conveyance (12:1)
Top 5 Social Horses and their Odds

Top 5 Social Horses and their Odds

Dublin, #1 – Despite being 12-1 odds, veteran trainer Wayne Lukas says this is his best horse since Charismatic won the Derby in 1999.  He has high hopes for Dublin’s chances.
Again, many not familiar with racing or horses often pick those most notable or popular trainers. Lukas is perhaps the most recognized, along with Bob Baffert, both Hall of Famers.

Lookin at Lucky, #2 – No surprise – he is the morning odds leader for the Derby. And this is legendary trainer Bob Baffert’s horse so that can’t hurt the buzz around Lookin at Lucky – especially those looking for a favorite to place a wager.

Eskendereya, #3  -  Although the horse was pulled early this week due to injury we included Eskendereya in the rankings – as we figured people would still be buzzing about it.  The horse was the clear favorite in the Derby before pulling out due to injury. And the announcement left the race wide open to speculation. How big was this news – even Wayne Lukas was quoted as saying, “it’s like taking Michael Jordan out of the picture.” People are clearly still buzzing about the horse and the news around it.

Super Saver, #4 – Seems to be a fan favorite, even though the odds against him.

Conveyance, #5 – A long shot but another of Baffert’s horses in the race.

In general, it is interesting that social media buzz can directly affect something like the Derby because of the betting cycle.

  • Share/Bookmark

$3.60 Facebook Fan Valuation Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

What’s the value of a Facebook Fan? - a question we are asked every day. Savvy marketers continue to invest substantial sums in building a presence on social networks like Facebook and Twitter.  They clearly see the Return on Investment (ROI), and we want to help you understand some of the reasons why.  So we developed the first-ever published Facebook fan valuation (also covered in this Adweek article)

According to our research a Facebook Page with 1 million fans is worth a minimum of $3.6 million in earned media annually. Honestly that’s just the tip of the iceberg as I’ll explain.

Let’s explore how we developed the Fan valuation.

Vitrue manages over 45 million fans and sampled data across varying pages from digital entertainment to retail to B2B to CPG to publishers to quick serve restaurants—in order to determine a wall post impression to Fan ratio. In other words, how many impressions can a single wall post receive? To our surprise we learned the average was approximately 1:1 (0.96:1 to be exact).

This means our 1 million Fan Facebook Page can average 1 million impressions with a single post to the wall. Factor frequency; a two post per day strategy would garner approximately 60 million impressions per month. Now here’s a metric all marketers are familiar with - we’ve been buying impressions since the dawn of the Internet.

These impressions are practically free, similar to earned media - that we are all familiar with. So our last step is to place a CPM value to our earned media. We factored a very conservative $5 CPM - how much would you pay for highly targeted impressions?

This final assumption gives our 1 million fan page $300,000 in earned media per month or $3.6 million annually.

1M impressions x 2 posts x 30 days = 60M impressions
60M impressions / 1000 x $5 CPM = $300,000

So there you have it: a simple valuation using metrics every marketer is familiar with. But that’s not all. Facebook wall posts have social engagement such as clicks, comments, likes, plays and shares. Wall Apps such as a coupon or a poll offer even greater levels of engagement. Brands engaging their Fans stand to earn much more value, potentially doubling or tripling these estimates.

Are you feeling short on fans? I hope this simple valuation helps you see the importance of a Facebook Fan acquisition strategy. One of the fastest ways to grow your Fan base is with Facebook Ads. You can also leverage Fan exclusive content/offers and deploy engaging apps.

Are you lacking a daily wall post strategy? Are your posts garnering maximum engagement? Vitrue works with marketers large and small to maximize ROI from the Facebook wall. The Vitrue SRM (Facebook publishing system) enables your marketing team to create and schedule a daily wall post strategy. Marketers can create eye-popping posts with video, images, audio and even apps that will maximize your Fan engagement. Comprehensive reporting gives you realtime metrics on clicks, comments, likes, plays, shares and app engagements.

Are you maximizing your ROI on Facebook? What strategies are you using to grow your Fan base? What’s your posting frequency? Leave a comment and join the conversation.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Vitrue 100: Top Social Brands of 2009

Monday, January 4th, 2010
The Vitrue 100 of 2009

  1. iPhone
  2. Disney
  3. CNN
  4. MTV
  5. NBA
  6. iTunes
  7. Wii
  8. Apple
  9. Xbox
  10. Nike
  11. Starbucks
  12. NFL
  13. PlayStation
  14. Adidas
  15. BlackBerry
  16. Sony
  17. Mercedes
  18. Microsoft
  19. Samsung
  20. BMW
  21. Nintendo
  22. Best Buy
  23. ESPN
  24. Ford
  25. Honda
  26. Ferrari
  27. Gucci
  28. Nokia
  29. Major League Baseball
  30. Dell
  31. Coca-Cola
  32. CBS
  33. ABC
  34. iPod
  35. Mac
  36. Turner
  37. Nissan
  38. Toyota
  39. eBay
  40. Amazon
  41. Victoria’s Secret
  42. Nutella
  43. NASCAR
  44. Disneyland
  45. Audi
  46. NHL
  47. Red Bull
  48. Verizon
  49. Intel
  50. Subway
  51. Hewlett-Packard
  52. Puma
  53. Kia
  54. Fox News
  55. Porsche
  56. Jeep
  57. Dodge
  58. Pandora
  59. Walmart
  60. Zappos
  61. Suzuki
  62. McDonald’s
  63. Krystal
  64. T-Mobile
  65. Skittles
  66. KFC
  67. Volkswagen
  68. NBC
  69. Sprint
  70. Pixar
  71. Motorola
  72. IKEA
  73. Pepsi
  74. Cisco
  75. REI
  76. LG
  77. AT&T
  78. Converse
  79. The Gap
  80. Chevrolet
  81. Louis Vuitton
  82. Toys”R”Us
  83. H&M
  84. Philips
  85. General Motors
  86. Pringles
  87. Visa
  88. Prada
  89. Panasonic
  90. IBM
  91. VH1
  92. Hulu
  93. Oracle
  94. Burberry
  95. SEGA
  96. Sears
  97. Avon
  98. Jet Blue
  99. Lacoste
  100. Comcast

vitrue100wall41We are excited to release our second annual ranking of the most social brands, The Vitrue 100. 2009 certainly marked the tipping point for social media with Facebook crossing 350 million month active users worldwide (100 million US users) according to “Inside Facebook”, December 2009.

Adoption of social media by marketers has also followed suit,  as eMarketer cites the percentage of the Fortune 500 not using social media has dropped dramatically - from 43% now to only 9%.

Forrester is also stating that social media marketing is projected to grow at an annual rate of 34%, faster than any other form of online marketing (US Interactive Marketing Spend 2009 to 2014 Report issued Summer 2009).

So what does all this mean as we head into 2010?  Marketers are adding social as a foundation into the marketing mix and need the infrastructure to manage their increasingly robust presences. TV spots are now tagged out with Facebook URLs instead of corporate web sites and point-of-sale call to actions now direct you to fan them on Facebook or follow them on Twitter.

Marketers get that social works. So with this in mind we established The Vitrue 100 to help bring credibility and clarity to this emerging space. The Vitrue 100 helps provide the industry with overall trends. We issue the list to highlight the most social brands and help demonstrate the value of social media marketing.

Some thoughts on this year’s list:

  • Overall provocative mix of blue chip brands – cross category from CPG to auto to electronics to retail
  • iPhone still reigns supreme, second year in a row as the most buzzed about brand on the social web
  • Game consoles dominate the top of the list Wii #7, Xbox#9, PlayStation #13, Nintendo #21
  • Biggest gainer this year was Adidas, also NBA, Nike, MLB, Nissan, Victoria’s Secret, HP, KFC all made impressive gains, check out The Vitrue 100 from 2008 here
  • Luxury brands on the list this year with good representation – Gucci #27, Louis Vuitton #81, Prada #88 and Burberry #94
  • Media brands make up 8% of list – CNN #3, MTV #4, ESPN #23, CBS #32, ABC #33, Turner #36, Fox News #56, NBC #68 – perhaps illustrating our socialization of their content
  • Cosmetic brands under represented missing outside of Avon at #97 as well as travel brands as jet Blue was the only airline to make this year’s list
  • Sport brands make sense to be so prominent too as people are very passionate NBA #5, NFL #12, MLB #29, NASCAR #43, NHL #46
  • Restaurants also make sense – people talk about where they want to eat – Subway #50, McDonald’s #62, Krystal #63, KFC #66
  • Automotive vertical well represented – Mercedes #17, BMW #20, Ford #24, Honda #25, Ferrari #27, Toyota #38, Audi #45, Kia #53, Porsche #55, Jeep #56, Dodge #57, Suzuki#61, Volkswagen #67, Chevrolet #80, GM #85

Take a look and let us know what you think.

Methodology
The Vitrue 100 is the result of Vitrue’s daily analysis of over 2,000 popular brands on the social web.

On July 1, 2009, we refined the SMI’s algorithm in our continual efforts to reflect the the social web.  See more details here> http://vitrue.com/smi/

The Vitrue SMI report is an easy to understand measurement of a brand’s online conversations. Based on our patent-pending technology, index scores are comprised of various online conversations from status updates to multi-dimensional video sites. The Vitrue SMI score provides a snapshot in time to help make sense of the overwhelming amount of measurable data.

We derive the Vitrue SMI by reviewing popular social media sites. We update the Vitrue SMI once daily. Our sample set represents different dimensions of social interactivity:

  • Social Networking - general sharing
  • Video Sharing - high engagement of viewing time and authenticity of dimension
  • Status Updates - aka Micro-Blogs; key influencers who chatter and actively push content
  • Photo Sharing - social meta data
  • Blogs - general blogsphere, commentary mentions

The index numbers are not intended to be used in absolute terms; rather, they provide a numerical basis to compare the social media prominence of two or more terms. We frequently update the algorithm based on changes in usage patterns, overall traffic and social network results.

The changing world of online conversations results in significant movements up and down for brands. The Vitrue 100 was determined by averaging the SMI scores for each brand across each day in December 2009. To further clarify, “annual” based on grouping of pull done once a year as the first Vitrue 100 was done December 2008 and we wanted to measure year over year. The result is a ranked list of the brands which are most talked about on the social web.

Some powerhouse technology brands were omitted from the list as they provide the backbone of many social networks.  While Google, Facebook and others are top brands, The Vitrue 100 is measuring companies that are using social technology, not those who are the technology.

  • Share/Bookmark

Effects of the Facebook News Feed Redesign for Brand Pages

Friday, November 6th, 2009

There has been a lot of discussion over the past week about the recent changes Facebook has put into place surrounding the home page news feed.  As of October 23rd, Facebook re-introduced the “pre-filtered” news feed which has been missing since March 2009, when the real-time live feed was introduced.  Users now have a choice to view the pre-filtered “news feed” or the real-time, un-filtered “live feed.”

So, what does this mean for managers of brand pages?

Because the pre-filtered news feed is the default option for all users, it means less fans are going to see your posts, by default.  How much less?  By analyzing customer data collected in Vitrue’s SRM (Social Relationship Manager) application suite, we’ve determined that, on average, there are approximately 57% less interactions and 30% less clicks on wall posts.  By interactions we mean likes and comments. This analysis compared multiple categories of posts from the 3 weeks prior to the change versus one week after the change and covered multiple Vitrue clients.

Effects of the Facebook News Feed Redesign

Why is this happening?

According to many industry insiders, including Justin Smith @ Inside Facebook, the algorithm which determines the content included in an individual user’s pre-filtered news feed takes into account the following:

- How many people (and especially your friends) comment on and like stories from Pages you’re a fan of
- Which Pages you visit frequently
- Which Pages you interact with frequently

With this change, it appears Facebook is adopting an “earned placement model” similar to Google search, at least with regards to this new default pre-filtered view.  Users that like the real-time “live feed” view can always change to it very easily and leave that as their default, but it’s likely a significant portion of users will continue to use the default served up to them by Facebook (as demonstrated by the 57% reduction in interactions measured by Vitrue SRM).

Another interesting element is that pages you frequently visit and interact with are more likely to appear again in your news feed.  This makes sense that your news feed would have items Facebook “thinks” are more relevant for you, but it also means Facebook is encouraging brand pages to have fans to visit their brand page instead of leaving Facebook for external sources through wall posts. There is also what appears to be a “Catch-22″ when it comes to earning more engagement on a wall post to earn placement in the pre-filtered news feed.  How do you get engagement on a wall post if users never see it in the first place in order to engage with it?

So, what do I do now?

All this is definitely encouraging page owners to create higher quality content which begs to be engaged with, which will keep users coming back for more interactions and more page visits, within the Facebook ecosystem.   How do you know what’s higher quality content? Facebook has a generic “post quality” rating they introduced this year which is a directional indicator of all of your posts.  But if you’re looking for more detailed information, the Vitrue SRM provides comprehensive information on click-throughs, comments, likes and moderation capabilities to analyze each post in detail.

  • Share/Bookmark

Vitrue Social Media Index - Version 1.0 Released

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

I’m extremely excited to announce the Vitrue Social Media Index Version 1.0. Yes, we have officially moved from Beta with our 1.0 release. It was just a year ago this month, when we started developing the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI) and released our first public Beta in October 2008.

The past nine months have brought many accolades for the Vitrue SMI, from the Forbes coverage of Fey/Palin to the ever popular Vitrue 100 - Most Social Brands of 2008, the Vitrue SMI has caught the attention of some of the top marketing influencers and executives. All told the Vitrue SMI provided a great foundation for what it set out to do - help the industry define social media measurement.  You can read more about the Vitrue SMI in the news at  http://vitrue.com/press-room

But, most importantly the Vitrue SMI has cemented Vitrue as a leading expert on social media buzz and offered marketers priceless information about their brands. So, it comes as no surprise that we continue our investment in the Vitrue SMI.

As the social media landscape continues to evolve, so must the Vitrue SMI. To keep up with the evolution, we have re-calibrated the algorithm to reflect site growth, decline and popularity from the major social networks. In addition we have added share functionality of reports directly to Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and as well as blog/site embed codes.

How social is your brand? Try the new Vitrue Social Media Index:

how social is your advertising?
vs.
Enter one or two brand names, phrases, or keywords
Vitrue Social Media Index. Measuring your online conversations.

One of the coolest new features of the Vitrue SMI are “Live Charts”. You can now share or post a “Live Chart” of your Vitrue SMI score and everyday the chart will dynamically update with the current Vitrue SMI score. This can be handy to include on a blog, presentation or intranet. In addition, you can share a static chart called “Today’s Chart”. Sharing or posting “Today’s Chart” will only display the score when you shared it (it’s static). Here’s a couple of live charts for Coke and Pepsi:

About the Vitrue Social Media Index Methodology:

Each day, Vitrue analyzes the online conversations on a variety of social networks, blogs, status updates (aka micro-blogs), photo and video sharing sites.

The Vitrue SMI calculates scores about the brand’s social conversations. We apply a series of algorithms to reflect the frequency of usage, the size of the social media environment, and the magnitude of the conversation. The result is a single numeric score for each brand: the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI).

Vitrue SMI scores to provide a simple, relative measure of conversations on the web.

The two most common uses are:

  1. Tracking movement of a single brand over time
  2. Comparing a brand with its competitors, either at an individual point in time or over a period of weeks or months

The changing world of online conversations results in significant movements up and down for brands.

Vitrue’s SMI reflects a combination of patent-pending technology, proprietary methodologies, and continuous refinement based on daily feedback and calibration. It provides the marketer with the industry’s simplest, most direct snapshot of conversations on the social web.

Questions or feedback? Join the conversation and leave a comment below.

  • Share/Bookmark

Does social value translate to overall brand value?

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

Many people question if a brand’s marketing efforts in social media are going to deliver results.  That’s a good question, but what kind of results?  Brands use marketing to accomplish a number of different objectives from brand awareness to direct response sales.  There’s also general brand loyalty and customer retention to consider.

Interbrand developed its own method for valuating the best global brands and it does so on an annual basis.  The result is a ranking of the 100 most “valuable” brands, which includes the likes of Coca-Cola, IBM and Microsoft.  Vitrue also released its own list, The Vitrue 100, which is a ranking of the 100 most “social” brands.

We thought it would be very interesting to do a thorough comparison  of the two lists to see if social value translates into overall brand value.  After all – doesn’t a brand want people talking about their brand and products?  Isn’t that why big brands spend millions on Super Bowl commercials, so people will talk about their brand and eventually buy their products as a result of those discussions?

Some interesting findings were discovered from our comparison of the 2008 rankings of the Vitrue 100 and the Interbrand 100:

  1. 68% of the Interbrand 25 are also in the Vitrue 100.  Key examples include Coca-Cola (Interbrand #1 and Vitrue #22); Microsoft (Interbrand #3 and Vitrue #11); Apple (Interbrand #24 and Vitrue #3)
  2. Some key brands with a large percentage change in Interbrand’s ranking from 2007 are ranked highly in the Vitrue 100.  For example, BlackBerry wasn’t even on Interbrand’s list in 2007 but jumped into spot #73 in 2008 and sits at #20 on the Vitrue 100.  Could their recent social activity be playing a part in the brand’s overall value?
  3. A number of brands have VERY similar ranking on both lists, further demonstrating a correlation between the two lists:
  • Disney = Interbrand #9 and Vitrue #4
  • Honda = Interbrand #20 and Vitrue #25
  • Pepsi = Interbrand #26 and Vitrue #30
  • Volkswagen = Interbrand #53 and Vitrue #58
  • Porsche = Interbrand #75 and Vitrue #74
  • BP = Interbrand #84 and Vitrue #86

So to answer the original question, “Does social value translate to overall brand value?”  The answer is YES!

Just ask Aaron Strout, who heard about the Vitrue 100 and compared the Interbrand (retail) rank and Vitrue rank of Best Buy in his MediaPost blog update noting that “[being social] does play a key role behind the prestigious “most valuable brand” ranking.”

While social activity does not represent the entire picture of a brand’s overall perception in the marketplace or overall value, it’s already become an extremely important component.  Purchase decisions on many products and services in today’s market are largely driven by personal recommendations rather than traditional forms of advertising and marketing.

According to a Forrester Media & Marketing Survey, “83% of online consumers turn to friends or acquaintances” regarding purchase decisions.  This holds true for me personally too.  I’m in the market for a new SUV and have received great feedback from friends on Facebook, which is influencing my decision far more than commercials on TV.

  • Share/Bookmark

Health Care and Social Media

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Yesterday I contributed to a health care blog using the Vitrue SMI to help measure health plan providers. You can read the post here at Health Plan Innovation Blog.

Many health care and pharmaceutical brands haven’t scratched the surface of social media marketing and engagement. As a highly regulated industry we know there are unique and challenging obstacles. However, brands that jump in will benefit greatly by grabbing the untapped market share on the social web.

As we continue to look at this vertical in the coming weeks and we’ll provide additional details. Take a look around and do you see a lack of social media adoption amongst health care and pharmaceutical brands? Let us know what you think. Leave a comment and join the conversation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Biggest Brand Movers on the Vitrue Social Media Index for January 2009

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

I wanted to share an update on the biggest brands movers on the Vitrue Social Media Index for the month of January 2009.

Kicking off the year we have seen some impressive point gains from an interesting mix of brands from Microsoft to Sony to Zune.

Leading the top gainers,  iPhone continues to dominate the social space adding over 300 points to its already commanding lead (iPhone was named the top social brand of 2008 on the Vitrue 100 a few weeks ago). Apple and iPod are also in the top five positive point movers for January.  Apple and its products account for three of the top five spots - incredible? Yes but it can also be attributed to the fact that January is typically an important month for Apple with the Macworld conference.

CNN also experienced huge gains, adding over 300 points to its base score.  This incredible gain is most likely attributed to President Obama’s inauguration and the unprecedented coverage of the live event with its Facebook integration.

Another notable in our overall list of  biggest movers is US Airways and must be due the heroic landing by Captain Sully and his crew to create the incredible Miracle on the Hudson which captured the hearts and minds of many - not to mention garnered huge buzz in the social space.

Vitrue SMI Biggest Movers Jan 2009

Vitrue SMI Biggest Movers Jan 2009

Here is some additional detail on the top five movers:

iPhone added 340 points with 43% growth on blogs and 14% on video sharing sites

CNN added an impressive 316 points with a 26% increase in micro-blogs and 5% increase in video sharing sites

Starbucks also had triple digit growth adding 298 points with a 68% increase in micro-blogs and 4% increase in photo sharing sites

Apple gained 239 points overall with a 12% increase in video sharing and 28% in blogs

Rounding out the top five is iPod adding 153 points to its base with a 13% increase in video sharing sites and 54% increase in micro-blogs

What are your thoughts on these biggest movers? Join the conversation and let us know what you think.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Vitrue 100 - Top Social Brands of 2008

Thursday, January 29th, 2009
The Vitrue 100 of 2008

  1. iPhone
  2. CNN
  3. Apple
  4. Disney
  5. Xbox
  6. Starbucks
  7. iPod
  8. MTV
  9. Sony
  10. Dell
  11. Microsoft
  12. Ford
  13. Nintendo
  14. Target
  15. PlayStation
  16. Mac
  17. Turner
  18. Hewlett-Packard
  19. Fox News
  20. BlackBerry
  21. ABC
  22. Coke
  23. LG
  24. Best Buy
  25. Honda
  26. eBay
  27. Sharp
  28. Lincoln
  29. NBA
  30. Pepsi
  31. General Motors
  32. McDonald’s
  33. General Electric
  34. Walmart
  35. NFL
  36. Mercedes
  37. BMW
  38. Samsung
  39. Nike
  40. Subway
  41. Dodge
  42. Pandora
  43. CBS
  44. Mercury
  45. NBC
  46. Disneyland
  47. last.fm
  48. Toyota
  49. Cadillac
  50. Chevy
  51. Jeep
  52. Netflix
  53. Nascar
  54. Suzuki
  55. Red Bull
  56. Wendy’s
  57. Burger King
  58. Volkswagen
  59. REI
  60. Nissan
  61. T-Mobile
  62. Verizon
  63. Macy’s
  64. AT&T
  65. Guess
  66. Victoria’s Secret
  67. Walt Disney World
  68. Audi
  69. TBS
  70. Cartoon Network
  71. IKEA
  72. SEGA
  73. Kia
  74. Porsche
  75. Fox
  76. Intel
  77. IBM
  78. VH1
  79. MLB
  80. Cisco
  81. Oracle
  82. Saturn
  83. Sprite
  84. Subaru
  85. Adidas
  86. BP
  87. AMC
  88. Chili’s
  89. The Gap
  90. Capital One
  91. Hyatt
  92. Costco
  93. KFC
  94. Adult Swim
  95. Jet Blue
  96. Taco Bell
  97. Converse
  98. Sirius
  99. Puma
  100. Sears

We are excited to release the first-ever top social brands of 2008 list, The Vitrue 100. Last year we launched our Social Media Index (SMI) which is designed to capture a brand’s share of voice on the social web. 

The paradigm shift that social media has created for brands is significant and marketers who are not embracing social media need to take notice. What was an afterthought of marketing, just a few years ago, has now emerged as a significant part of the marketing mix and it continues to grow fast. The Vitrue 100 list represents companies who are establishing their social presence and doing so successfully. 

We established The Vitrue 100 to help bring credibility and clarity to this emerging space. The Vitrue 100 helps define who is winning, who could be doing better and provides the industry with overall trends.  

Press Release: Announcing The Vitrue 100
Advertising Age: The Most Social Brands of 2008

Methodology

The Vitrue 100 is the result of Vitrue’s daily analysis of over 2,000 popular brands.

Each day, Vitrue analyzes the online conversations on a variety of social networking, blogging, microblogging, photo and video sharing sites.

The Vitrue SMI calculates scores about the brand’s social conversations. We apply a series of algorithms to reflect the frequency of usage, the size of the social media environment, and the magnitude of the conversation. The result is a single numeric score for each brand: the Vitrue Social Media Index (SMI).

The Vitrue SMI is a unit-less number and that can be compared with other Vitrue SMI scores to provide a simple, relative measure of conversations on the web.

The two most common uses are:

  1. Tracking movement of a single brand over time
  2. Comparing a brand with its competitors, either at an individual point in time or over a period of weeks or months

The changing world of online conversations results in significant movements up and down for brands. The Vitrue 100 was determined by averaging the SMI scores for each brand across each day in December 2008. The result is a ranked list of the brands which are most talked about on the social web.

Because people often do not use a product’s full name in online conversations, we adapt our results to reflect common language usage. This dynamic process continues to evolve along with brands and language itself, with the goal of having the Vitrue SMI reflect the way people actually speak and type about brands.

Vitrue’s SMI reflects a combination of patent-pending technology, proprietary methodologies, and continuous refinement based on daily feedback and calibration. It provides the marketer with the industry’s simplest, most direct snapshot of conversations on the social web.

We welcome your input.
We continue to evolve and refine the SMI to capture and measure social conversations on the web. We’d love to hear from you. Leave a comment and join the conversation about The Vitrue 100.

  • Share/Bookmark